Copy
View this email in your browser

Member News


27 January 2022

Coveris launches fully recyclable rice packs for Aldi



27 January 2022

Ball reports strong 2021 results


27 January 2022

TotalEnergies and Berry Global advance material circularity by using recycled plastic in food packaging



27 January 2022

At the forefront of material positive innovation

27 January 2022

Klӧckner Pentaplast commits to rPET/PET capacity expansion for the sustainable healthcare and food packaging market in North America

27 January 2022

Nestlé announces innovative plan to tackle child labor risks, increase farmer income and achieve full traceability in cocoa



27 January 2022

Plastipak makes European recycling investment


26 January 2022

Dow named to Bloomberg's Gender-Equality Index for second consecutive year


26 January 2022

Essity releases 2021 year-end report


26 January 2022

Ocado Re:Imagined is unveiled


26 January 2022

Reuse is the way to unlock the shackles of single use

25 January 2022

Dow signs exclusive agreement with Locus Performance Ingredients to expand biosurfactant offerings in the Global Home Care and Personal Care Markets


25 January 2022

TV programme takes a look at how the world-famous Doritos are made


25 January 2022

PepsiCo are eliminating virgin fossil-based plastic in all crisp and snack bags by 2030

24 January 2022

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners France certified “Top Employer” 2022


24 January 2022

Turn points into positivity: New Nectar launch enables customers to donate points to charity


21 January 2022

ProAmpac announces smart packaging partnership with Rutgers professor


20 January 2022

Associated British Foods release trading update for the 16 weeks to 8 Jan 2022


20 January 2022

There's no time to waste for action on emissions


20 January 2022

Dow joins Cyclyx as consortium's newest member


20 January 2022

Una-peel-ing: Brits bin more than £1.17 billion worth of fruit and veg each year

20 January 2022

Sonoco's UK plants complete IOSH Safety qualification

19 January 2022

Net zero means trusting partners you haven’t met and technology that doesn’t yet exist


19 January 2022

Dow introduces innovative technologies and sustainable solutions at Automotive World 2022


19 January 2022

Tesco brings £300k Blue Monday cheer for community groups nationwide


18 January 2022

Aldi's checkout-free concept store opens for public testing


17 January 2022

Aldi's billion-pound boost for British businesses


17 January 2022

100k Sustainability Challenge


17 January 2022

Dow achieves new milestones to helping to promote a circular economy in China with Liby’s sustainable packaging


17 January 2022

Inspiring change with WasteAid through local waste management initiatives


14 January 2022

M&S Food and bp extend successful forecourt convenience relationship


14 January 2022

Sainsbury’s strengthens top team and creates Chief Transformation Officer role

13 January 2022

Coca-Cola HBC AG completes the acquisition of a majority stake in Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Egypt

13 January 2022

Crown celebrates sustainability achievements from across its global network


13 January 2022

New Nestlé Professional report celebrates and inspires sustainability heroes


12 January 2022

Dow earns trio of BIG™ Innovation Awards


12 January 2022

What the nation ate: Sainsbury’s reveals the top food trends of 2021

12 January 2022

Premier Foods reduce brand's environmental impact by reducing the height of its Bisto gravy paperboard drum



11 January 2022

Berry launches lighter cap to boost circularity

11 January 2022

Digital customer engagement: 'Packed and ready for a long and exciting adventure!'

11 January 2022

Costa Coffee launches a new reusable range for 2022!



11 January 2022

Evian launches sparking water in cans & bottles

11 January 2022

Dow invests in recycler, Mr. Green Africa, to address waste management gaps and accelerate a circular economy for plastics in Africa


10 January 2022

Aldi reports best ever Christmas


10 January 2022

Berry Staja jar provides space saving on shelves & channels


10 January 2022

Another Round of Recognition for ProAmpac’s Fresh Food-To-Go Packaging


7 January 2022

Padless Tray Technology by Klöckner Pentaplast wins Global Award


7 January 2022

#leadwithlove - in 2022, and beyond


7 January 2022

Sainsbury’s invests £100m in colleague reward with basic hourly pay of at least £10


6 January 2022

Aldi donates 550,000 meals to charities across the UK over Christmas



6 January 2022

Danone strengthens its leadership team


6 January 2022

M&S helps customers to Spark change and enjoy lower carbon diets in 2022


6 January 2022

McDonald's UK&I is proud to announce the new McPlant is officially...everywhere


5 January 2022

P&G takes first step into the metaverse with BeautySphere

31 December 2021

Let's SHWOP: M&S encourages the 65% of customers planning a New Year's wardrobe clear-out to donate their clothes via Shwopping to be resold, reused or recycled


30 December 2021

Generous Tesco shoppers thanked for donating 1.5 million meals


29 December 2021

Aldi looking to recruit over 100 new British suppliers in 2022


29 December 2021

Tesco powers into the new year with the UK’s first commercial electric articulated HGVs

Legislation Updates

INCPEN Members (not including Trade Association Group colleagues) have access to view the full legislation library.  Please contact Alison Skuse for access.

Netherlands - Industry proposes return of DRS containers to 'Circular Hubs' rather than to retail - 21 Jan 2022

Since Jul-21 a mandatory DRS has been applied to plastic beverage bottles. From Jan-23 the DRS will also cover metal cans. Industry and packaging PRO StaV have now proposed an operational DRS mechanism that relies on ‘Circular Hubs’ rather than retailers as return-route for DRS containers. Environmental groups oppose the plan, fearing that it would make the return inconvenient. Meanwhile the Government is considering a collection target for beverage cartons to discourage switching to non-DRS subjected packaging

Background
In Oct-20, State Secretary Ms. Van Veldhoven (succeeded) proposed the imposition of a mandatory DRS on cans unless industry achieved a litter reduction rate of 70% and a collection rate of 90% in 2021. On 3-Feb-21, following the release of municipal data concluding that the required waste reductions would be impossible to achieve, State Secretary Van Weyenberg (incumbent) announced his decision to activate the mandatory DRS on cans. A May-21 Decree 228/2021 subjected metal beverage packaging for all beverage types with a volume of 3L to a mandatory deposit from 2023 and to a 90% collection target from 2024.

The imposition of the DRS for metal cans follows a similar procedure to that for plastic bottles: In the context of the SUPD’s Art.9 collection targets for plastic beverage bottles (77%/90% by 2025/2029), Ms Van Veldhoven felt it necessary issue a Mar-20 Decree that imposed – from Jan-22 – a 90% recycling target and a mandatory DRS for all beverage plastic bottles below 3 liter. In Apr-21 she decided to bring the enforcement date of the DRS for plastic bottles forward to Jul-21.  Note: From 2003 to 2015, a mandatory DRS applied to all plastic soft drink and water bottles above 0.5 liters. After the expiry of the DRS obligation, StaV encouraged producers to continue the DRS by charging very high recycling fees (EUR 7,500 per ton POM, or about EUR 0.25 per bottle) on plastic beverage bottles that did not participate in a DRS. Plastic bottles that did were only charged EUR 20 per ton, about 1/20 of fee for other plastic packaging.

Industry proposes return of DRS containers to ‘Circular Hubs’ rather than to retail
On 14-Dec-21, packaging PRO StaV, the food retail association CBL and the food and drinks industry federation FNLI released a joint ‘Action plan for a future-proof deposit system for metal beverage packaging’. The organisations expect the DRS design and the financing particulars to be ironed out in H1-22 and the DRS to be soft launched in H2-22. The Plan is supported by State Secretary Van Weyenberg.

A particularity of the plan is that it does not foresee any in-store retail return points for packaging subject to the DRS. Supermarkets have been reluctant to participate in the DRS, arguing that a DRS imposes on them a disproportionate amount of responsibility and costs. Although many continue to take-back of empty plastic beverage packaging within their stores (mainly through reverse vending machines), some are exercising their right not to do so. * Recall that the Apr-20 Decree 122/2020 introducing the DRS on plastic beverage containers also removed the requirement for supermarkets with a sales area >200 sqm to take-back deposit packaging. Supermarkets have, however, indicated that they are willing to provide emergency (temporary) return services for cans in the event of a delay in the establishment of adequate return infrastructure.

Rather than retail return points, the Plan foresees a network of 3,000 primary return points located ‘near’ (proximity undefined) supermarkets. These return points would be gradually be opened to take back other packaging materials, and then referred to as ‘Circular Hubs’. This indicates a gradual shift away from supermarket-operated return points for plastic deposit packaging and towards independent producer-arranged return points for all deposit packaging. Currently [only] Estonia has such a system in place.

The 3,000 “Circular Hubs” would be supplemented by around 5,000 voluntary return points and an additional 300 points at ‘high traffic’ locations.

Environmental groups push for re-instatement of retailer’s take-back obligation
Environmental groups (namely Recycling Netwerk Benelux, Natuur & Milieu, Plastic Soup Foundation, Plastic Soup Surfers, the North Sea Foundation and Greenpeace) believe the industry proposal inadequate for meeting the 90% collection target arguing that
  • 89% of consumers favor returning cans at the POS;
  • the ~3,000 permanent return locations for cans compare to 5,500 supermarkets which currently take-back plastic bottles, while the number of cans is almost 2.5 times that of plastic bottles;
  • there are almost no examples of DRS’ being established without the participation of the retail sector (except in Estronia);
  • the successful establishment of return infrastructure within the (short) implementational time-frame is doubtful, as it is highly dependent on agreements and permits from property owners and municipalities.
The groups thus are lobbying Parliament and the new Cabinet to re-instate the obligation for the retail sector to take-back all deposit bearing packaging.

Collection target considered for beverage cartons to discourage switching to non-DRS subjected packaging
On 17-Nov-21, in a letter to Parliament, State Secretary Van Weyenberg announced that, in light of a rising number of producers reportedly switching from plastic containers to beverage cartons – to avoid participation in the DRS – that the Department of Waterways and Public Works (Rijkswaterstaat) will monitor increases in the incidence of beverage cartons in the municipal waste stream to decide whether additional regulatory measures are needed.

It is likely that a recycling target will likely be imposed on beverage cartons from 2023.

Sweden - Municipalities unhappy with proposal for municipal control over packaging collection - 12 Jan 2022

A comprehensive 240+ page government memorandum proposes to shift the operational responsibility for the collection of household packaging and printed paper waste from producers to municipalities to improve collection, while producers would retain the financial responsibility for collection and treatment. Municipalities are unsatisfied with the proposal arguing further clarification and more flexibility on the regime’s design is needed.

On 5-Nov-21, the memorandum, entitled "An Improved Packaging Collection - New Roles for Municipalities and Producers", was sent to 143 stakeholders (municipalities, authorities, retailers, recyclers) for comments ending 7-Feb-22. 

The memorandum is an attempt to move beyond the political disagreement about whether municipalities or producers should have operational control over packaging waste collection – a discussion ongoing for over 6 years. 

It contains 8 legislative proposals summarised as follows:
  • The municipalities
    • will take over the operational responsibility for collecting packaging waste from households and businesses whose packaging waste is collected together with household packaging waste;
    • must collect waste paper and cardboard, plastic, glass and metal packaging from households close to the property (curbside). Other types of packaging - for example wood, ceramics and textiles - as well as bulky packaging must be collected in easily accessible places;
    • must also collect sorted packaging waste in specially prepared places for the public where a lot of packaging waste is generated;
    • must hand over collected packaging waste to the PROs, based on their market share of each material;
    • must provide trans-shipment stations and have routines for calculating and checking that the correct amount of waste is handed over to the respective producer responsibility organisation (PRO). 
  • The producers must finance the collection and treatment and cover the municipalities' costs for trans-shipment and information to households. New arrangements are laid out for competing PROs to operate alongside each other. The EPA will be responsible for determining market shares and ensuring that materials are divided fairly.
  • If there is no approved PRO, the municipality must ensure that the packaging waste that falls under the municipality's collection responsibility is treated.
Municipal control over waste packaging collection will be phased in from 2024 and from 1-Jan-26, all municipalities must have their own collection systems in place. Until municipalities transition away from PRO-operated collection systems, PROs would continue to manage waste packaging collected at their own ‘bring sites’.

As regards non-household waste packaging, PROs will continue to be responsible for collecting packaging waste from businesses that is not collected together with household packaging waste (non-household).  The largest PRO will be responsible for operating collection points in each municipality.

A decision on a new revised regulation, based on the memorandum's proposal, is expected to be made in June 2022.

Municipalities want more say in the regime’s design
The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SKR) rejects the Government's proposal. A press release issued by SKR on 17-Dec-21 reveals concerns over:
  • the implementational complications and difficulties of newly establishing curb-side collection infrastructure;
  • the ‘unrealistically short’ implementation schedule (to be phased over 2024-2026);
  • doubt that municipalities will receive full cost coverage for packaging collection;
  • the over-detail and inflexibility regarding how the system should be designed and operated, with the argument that if municipalities are to be given ultimate responsibility, it should be them that designs the system;
  • the high expense of running the system - as currently proposed;
  • a risk and impact assessment as regards the consequences on urban planning is lacking.
Packaging PRO FTI – the largest packaging PRO which handles almost all household (and a large portion of non-household) packaging waste – had previously rejected the concept of full municipal control over the waste packaging regime, but has since warmed to the idea given a thorough ‘reality-addressing’ framework is in place. The newly appointed CEO of FTI Helena Nylén has welcomed the proposal for taking into account the organisation’s views expressed during its development, while stating that it contains ‘significant shortcomings’.

The Swedish Waste Management recycling association (Avfall Sverige) generally supports the concept, as well as the proposed compensation/financing mechanism, but agrees with SKR in that:
  • certain aspects of the financing mechanism (as well as other elements of the proposal) need further clarification; and that
  • the methodology for calculating collection costs needs further fleshing out.
Background
The 2014 Packaging Ordinance (2014:1073) required for the first time that packaging PROs were to be licensed from 2016. This deadline was delayed several times due to political disagreement about whether municipalities or producers should have operational control over collection. 

In Jul-18, a revision of the ordinances required PROs to provide curbside collection of all packaging materials for 60% of residential properties by 2021 and 100% from Apr-25 as a licensing condition. The deadline for obtaining the license was moved to Jan-21.

In Jun-20 the Swedish EPA rejected license applications from PRO FTI and another party as both 'will not meet the requirements to be able to collect from 60% of the residential properties in 2021' and because both appear to be similar, meaning that they don't 'complement each other but rather duplicate each other's systems'. The EPA was to recommend changes to regulatory requirements for PROs to the Government.

In Oct-20, the deadline for PROs to be licensed was postponed to Jan-23. 

In Feb-21, the government tasked the MoE with submitting proposals for a new Ordinance with the aim of creating conditions that would allow achieving the material recycling targets of the EU Circular Economy Packaging and its EPR requirements.

News from Industry

INCPEN on Twitter INCPEN on Twitter
Paul Vanston on Twitter Paul Vanston on Twitter
incpen.org incpen.org
Copyright © 2022 Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp